Mar 30 2009
Auto industry in limbo
President Obama announced this morning that his administration is withholding further federal aid from General Motors and Chrysler until they can prove that they can continue to exist as viable businesses on their own. He said the companies have not yet done enough to demonstrate that they will be able to do that. At the same time, he assured the American people that the automobile industry in the United States will not be allowed to just fade away. He also announced that the federal government is preparing to offer several incentives to get Americans to buy more U.S.-made cars and that the government is willing to warrant new automobiles purchased from American manufacturers…
The complete text of the President’s statement may be read following the break.
Remarks of President Barack Obama
Announcement on the Auto IndustryMarch 30, 2009
Washington, DCOne of the challenges we’ve confronted from the beginning of this administration is what to do with the state of the struggling auto industry. In recent months, my Auto Task Force has been reviewing requests by General Motors and Chrysler for additional government assistance, as well as plans developed by each of these companies to restructure, to modernize, and to make themselves more competitive. Our evaluation is now complete. But before I lay out what needs to be done going forward, I want to say a few words about where we are and what led us to this point.
It will come as no surprise that some Americans who have suffered most during this recession have been those in the auto industry and those working for companies that support it. Over the past year, our auto industry has shed over 400,000 jobs, not only at plants that produce cars, but at the businesses that produce the parts that go into them and the dealers that sell and repair them. More than one in 10 Michigan residents is out of work — the most of any state. And towns and cities across the great Midwest have watched unemployment climb higher than it’s been in decades.
The pain being felt in places that rely on our auto industry is not the fault of our workers; they labor tirelessly and desperately want to see their companies succeed. It’s not the fault of all the families and communities that supported manufacturing plants throughout the generations. Rather, it’s a failure of leadership — from Washington to Detroit — that led our auto companies to this point.
Year after year, decade after decade, we’ve seen problems papered over and tough choices kicked down the road, even as foreign competitors outpaced us. Well, we’ve reached the end of that road. And we, as a nation, cannot afford to shirk responsibility any longer. Now is the time to confront our problems head-on and do what’s necessary to solve them.
We cannot, and must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish. This industry is like no other — it’s an emblem of the American spirit; a once and future symbol of America’s success. It’s what helped build the middle class and sustained it throughout the 20th century. It’s a source of deep pride for the generations of American workers whose hard work and imagination led to some of the finest cars the world has ever known. It’s a pillar of our economy that has held up the dreams of millions of our people. And we cannot continue to excuse poor decisions. We cannot make the survival of our auto industry dependent on an unending flow of taxpayer dollars. These companies — and this industry — must ultimately stand on their own, not as wards of the state.
And that’s why the federal government provided General Motors and Chrysler with emergency loans to prevent their sudden collapse at the end of last year — only on the condition that they would develop plans to restructure. In keeping with that agreement, each company has submitted a plan to restructure. But after careful analysis, we’ve determined that neither goes far enough to warrant the substantial new investments that these companies are requesting.
And so today I’m announcing that my administration will offer GM and Chrysler a limited additional period of time to work with creditors, unions, and other stakeholders to fundamentally restructure in a way that would justify an investment of additional taxpayer dollars. During this period they must produce plans that would give the American people confidence in their long-term prospects for success.
Now, what we’re asking for is difficult. It will require hard choices by companies. It will require unions and workers who have already made extraordinarily painful concessions to do more. It’ll require creditors to recognize that they can’t hold out for the prospect of endless government bailouts. It’ll have to — it will require efforts from a whole host of other stakeholders, including dealers and suppliers. Only then can we ask American taxpayers who have already put up so much of their hard-earned money to once more invest in a revitalized auto industry.
But I’m confident that if each are willing to do their part, if all of us are doing our part, then this restructuring, as painful as it will be in the short term, will mark not an end, but a new beginning for a great American industry — an auto industry that is once more out-competing the world; a 21st century auto industry that is creating new jobs, unleashing new prosperity, and manufacturing the fuel-efficient cars and trucks that will carry us towards an energy-independent future. I am absolutely committed to working with Congress and the auto companies to meet one goal: The United States of America will lead the world in building the next generation of clean cars.
And no one can deny that our auto industry has made meaningful progress in recent years — and this doesn’t get talked about often enough. Some of the cars made by American workers right now are outperforming the best cars made abroad. In 2008, the North American Car of the Year was a GM. This year, Buick tied for first place as the most reliable car in the world. Our companies are investing in breakthrough technologies that hold the promise of new vehicles that will help America end its addiction to foreign oil.
But our auto industry is not moving in the right direction fast enough to succeed in a very tough environment. So let me discuss what measures need to be taken by each of the auto companies requesting taxpayer assistance, and I’ll start with General Motors.
GM has made a good faith effort to restructure over the past several months — but the plan that they’ve put forward is, in its current form, not strong enough. However, after broad consultation with a range of industry experts and financial advisors, I’m absolutely confident that GM can rise again, providing that it undergoes a fundamental restructuring. As an initial step, GM is announcing today that Rick Wagoner is stepping aside as Chairman and CEO. This is not meant as a condemnation of Mr. Wagoner, who’s devoted his life to this company and has had a distinguished career; rather, it’s a recognition that will take new vision and new direction to create the GM of the future.
In this context, my administration will offer General Motors adequate working capital over the next 60 days. And during this time, my team will be working closely with GM to produce a better business plan. They must ask themselves: Have they consolidated enough unprofitable brands? Have they cleaned up their balance sheets, or are they still saddled with so much debt that they can’t make future investments? Above all, have they created a credible model for how not only to survive, but to succeed in this competitive global market?
Let me be clear: The United States government has no interest in running GM. We have no intention of running GM. What we are interested in is giving GM an opportunity to finally make those much-needed changes that will let them emerge from this crisis a stronger and more competitive company.
The situation at Chrysler is more challenging. It’s with deep reluctance but also a clear-eyed recognition of the facts that we’ve determined, after careful review, that Chrysler needs a partner to remain viable. Recently, Chrysler reached out and found what could be a potential partner — the international car company Fiat, where the current management team has executed an impressive turnaround. Fiat is prepared to transfer its cutting-edge technology to Chrysler and, after working closely with my team, has committed to build — building new fuel-efficient cars and engines right here in the United States. We’ve also secured an agreement that will ensure that Chrysler repays taxpayers for any new investments that are made before Fiat is allowed to take a majority ownership stake in Chrysler.
Still, such a deal would require an additional investment of taxpayer dollars, and there are a number of hurdles that must be overcome to make it work. I’m committed to doing all I can to see if a deal can be struck in a way that upholds the interests of American taxpayers. And that’s why we’ll give Chrysler and Fiat 30 days to overcome these hurdles and reach a final agreement — and we will provide Chrysler with adequate capital to continue operating during that time. If they are able to come to a sound agreement that protects American taxpayers, we will consider lending up to $6 billion to help their plan succeed. But if they and their stakeholders are unable to reach such an agreement, and in the absence of any other viable partnership, we will not be able to justify investing additional tax dollars to keep Chrysler in business.
Now, while Chrysler and GM are very different companies with very different paths forward, both need a fresh start to implement the restructuring plan they develop. That may mean using our bankruptcy code as a mechanism to help them restructure quickly and emerge stronger. Now, I want everybody to be clear about this. I know that when people hear the word “bankruptcy” it can be unsettling, so let me explain exactly what I mean. What I’m talking about is using our existing legal structure as a tool that, with the backing of the U.S. government, can make it easier for General Motors and Chrysler to quickly clear away old debts that are weighing them down so that they can get back on their feet and onto a path to success; a tool that we can use, even as workers staying on the job building cars that are being sold.
What I’m not talking about is a process where a company is simply broken up, sold off, and no longer exists. We’re not talking about that. And what I’m not talking about is a company that’s stuck in court for years, unable to get out.
So it’s my hope that the steps I’m announcing today will have a salutary effect — will go a long way forward towards answering many of the questions that people have about the future of GM and Chrysler.
But just in case there’s still nagging doubts, let me say it as plainly as I can: If you buy a car from Chrysler or General Motors, you will be able to get your car serviced and repaired, just like always. Your warranty will be safe. In fact, it will be safer than it’s ever been, because starting today, the United States government will stand behind your warranty.
But we must also recognize that the difficulties facing this industry are due in no small part to the weaknesses in our economy as a whole. And therefore, to support demand for auto sales during this period, I’m directing my team to take several steps.
First, we will ensure that Recovery Act funds to purchase government cars get out as quickly as possible and work through the budget process to accelerate other federal fleet purchases, as well.
Second, we’ll accelerate our efforts through the Treasury Department’s Consumer and Business Lending Initiative. And we are working intensively with the auto finance companies to increase the flow of credit to both consumers and dealers.
Third, the IRS is launching a campaign to alert consumers of a new tax benefit for auto purchases made between February 16th and the end of this year — if you buy a car anytime this year, you may be able to deduct the cost of any sales and excise taxes. And this provision could save families hundreds of dollars and lead to as many as 100,000 new car sales.
Finally, several members of Congress have proposed an even more ambitious incentive program to increase car sales while modernizing our auto fleet. And such fleet modernization programs, which provide a generous credit to consumers who turn in old, less fuel-efficient cars and purchase cleaner cars, have been successful in boosting auto sales in a number of European countries. I want to work with Congress to identify parts of the Recovery Act that could be trimmed to fund such a program, and make it retroactive starting today.
Now, let there be no doubt, it will take an unprecedented effort on all our parts — from the halls of Congress to the boardroom, from the union hall to the factory floor — to see the auto industry through these difficult times. And I want every American to know that the path I’m laying out today is our best chance to make sure that the cars of the future are built where they’ve always been built — in Detroit and across the Midwest — to make America’s auto industry in the 21st century what it was in the 20th century — unsurpassed around the world. The path has been chosen after consulting with other governments that are facing this crisis. We’ve worked closely with the government of Canada on GM and Chrysler, as both those companies have extensive operations there. The Canadian government has indicated its support for our approach and will be announcing their specific commitments later today.
While the steps I’m taking will have an impact on all Americans, some of our fellow citizens will be affected more than others. So I’d like to speak directly to all those men and women who work in the auto industry or live in countless communities that depend on it. Many of you have been going through tough times for longer than you care to remember. And I won’t pretend that the tough times are over. I can’t promise you there isn’t more difficulty to come.
But what I can promise you is this: I will fight for you. You’re the reason I’m here today. I got my start fighting for working families in the shadows of a shuttered steel plant. I wake up every single day asking myself what can I do to give you and working people all across this country a fair shot at the American Dream.
When a community is struck by a natural disaster, the nation responds to put it back on its feet. While the storm that has hit our auto towns is not a tornado or a hurricane, the damage is clear, and we must likewise respond. And that’s why today I’m designating a new Director of Recovery for Auto Communities and Workers to cut through the red tape and ensure that the full resources of our federal government are leveraged to assist the workers, communities, and regions that rely on our auto industry. Edward Montgomery, a former Deputy Labor Secretary, has agreed to serve in this role.
And together with Labor Secretary Solis and my Auto Task Force, Ed will help provide support to auto workers and their families, and open up opportunity to manufacturing communities in Michigan and Ohio and Indiana and every other state that relies on the auto industry.
They will have a strong advocate in Ed. He will direct a comprehensive effort that will help lift up the hardest-hit areas by using the unprecedented levels of funding available in our Recovery Act and throughout our government to create new manufacturing jobs and new businesses where they’re needed most — in your communities. And he will also lead an effort to identify new initiatives we may need to help support your communities going forward.
These efforts, as essential as they are, are not going to make everything better overnight. There are jobs that won’t be saved. There are plants that may not reopen. There’s little I can say that can subdue the anger or ease the frustration of all whose livelihoods hang in the balance because of failures that weren’t theirs.
But there’s something I want everybody to remember. Remember that it is precisely in times like these — in moments of trial and moments of hardship — that Americans rediscover the ingenuity and resilience that makes us who we are; that made the auto industry what it once was and what it will be again; that sent those first mass-produced cars rolling off the assembly lines; that built an arsenal of democracy that propelled America to victory in the Second World War; and that powered our economic prowess in the first American century.
Because I know that if we can tap into that same ingenuity and resilience right now, if we can carry one another through this difficult time and do what must be done, then we will look back and say that this was the moment when the American auto industry shed its old ways, marched into the future, remade itself, and once more became an engine of opportunity and prosperity not only in Detroit, not only in our Midwest, but all across America.
I’m confident we can make that happen, but we’ve got a lot of work to do. Thank you. Thank you, everybody.
16 Responses to “Auto industry in limbo”


FYI, the government warranty coverage is only for General Motors and Chrysler product vehicles, not Ford products. Also, foreign manufacturers who build cars in the United States are not covered by this plan.
@Matt Keegan : I kinda thought the topic of today’s talk was General Motors and Chrysler. I apologize if I left a different impression.
Len, I think this is a good start but Obama does nto go far enough. As Matt points out, foreign companies making autos in the United States are not covered by this, although they are providing employment to whole host of Americans.
More importantly, though, it really does sound like simply a tactic to extract a “promise” which is not legally binding and for which there will be no consequences if broken.
Another president at another time will do the same and the auto companies will get away with it again.
They need to start making cars that Americans want to drive, without being paid or bribed by the government to do this.
This sort of protection of local auto industries is for backward countries. The USSR kept its boxy Russian cars going by doing exactly this – freezing out international competition (which actually gives locals the incentive to make better products and gives them lessons in more efficient production etc)
I still say, if the Big Three (or Two, in this case), should be told to either sink or swim, it is up to them and not up to you, the citizens. What benefit to they give you when they are healthy and making loads of profit? None, even on taxes they cook the books. Why should you give them any money now that they are in trouble?
Good. It’s about time these auto makers wake up and smell the coffee.
Are you kidding? Len but can you point out where in the Constitution it says we should, at any time, give taxpayer dollars to loser companies who have failed due to the unions bloated bennies and salaries. Oh and point out the part of the Constitution that says Barry has a right to fire Presidents of said loser companies. Now….when you find out that there is nothing Constitutional about this, let’s all bond over who REALLY thinks the Constitution is “just a piece of paper”.
@Jenn : Perhaps you could point out where in the Constitution it says that we, the taxpayers of America, should subsidize the multimillion dollar bonus packages and golden parachutes of failed corporate and Wall Street executives. (The “fired” CEO of General Motors is receiving a retirement package of over $20 million. I am shedding no tears for him. Though I am sure you bleeding hearts on the right are.)
By the way, is every breath you take covered by the Constitution? Where in there does it talk about email, or blogs, or PC vs. Mac?
And that’s President Barry to you, ma’am!
(You’re fun.)
Until the unions go away the US auto industry will never have any health. They add $1,200 per car cost the other guys don’t pay, plus other stuff.
@Harrison : What do you do for a living, Harrison? Do you add any cost to your employer’s product? Perhaps you work for free or are independently wealthy? Or a CEO or Wall Street broker?
Do you really believe that the wages of American workers should be determined by what workers in other countries earn? Perhaps the cost of living should also be adjusted to that of those countries? I’m sorry, but the arguments you present on your website are nothing short of ridiculous.
As much as I don’t like the idea of bailing out the auto industry I didn’t think it was really fair for President Obama to ask Mr. Wagner to step down.
How about all money that went into AIG, Citibank, BoA? Why aren’t there anyone forced to step down from those companies?
@plin : We actually did replace the CEO of AIG. But I agree with you, more heads should have rolled at the banks and on Wall Street. We’re giving those guys a lot more money than we are lending to the auto industry and we seem to be demanding a lot less from them. Not quite fair somehow, is it?
If you can’t run a company and come crying to the government to bail you out – you’re out, it’s simple and straight forward.
I also think the unions are a big part of the Auto Industries woes.
We are in this situation because of greed plain and simple, everyone thinks they (and often times their product) is worth more than it is.
@Mamaflo : With the average CEO making 500 or 600 times what the average worker makes, I find it kind of difficult to blame all of this on the unions. In spite of popular belief, the unions do not make the executive decisions.
If you are working less than 80 hours per week, if your kids are in school rather than working in a sweat shop next to you, if your employer is providing you with benefits like health care or a retirement or pension plan (or is contributing toward things like this for you), if you enjoy at least one day off per week, you can thank the unions. I know there’s lots more, but that will do for the moment.
I just have a lot of trouble blaming the American workers who have built this country for the condition in which it now finds itself. The workers did not do this.
So now the American taxpayer will be on the hook for even more failure. Why!? When will this end? No more bailouts–Let GM file for bankruptcy like the private corporation that it is.
today he (President Obama) made a mistake, imho.
he went after the wrong folks.
they did this bass ackward. as my hubby likes to say.
when he attacked the autoworkers, he attacked me.
that’s the one thing he shouldn’t have done.
I was in his column till he did this.
oh yeah, I’m now counting myself as a liberaterian – or however you all spell it.
Like You Len – things changed up in here for me.
I was formerly in the financials industry and He knows what he did was because his bwoys in the banks tellin him that’s how to play it.
every blog I read that said he was cozy with the bankers I doubted, no more.
this was his first big strike with me, and from now on, I will NOT be defending anything he does or says – because he tried to take credibility out of what my family; and myself have worked for generations to build. AMERICA.
does he forget where the BEAST came from ?
yeahhh Mr President, I’m watchin you now Bwoyyyy..
you and ya 500 member Entourage, Including Your Personal Supply Of BLOOD; on tour of London; On MY DIME.
Len – re your response to Jenn – there was nothing constitutional about the bailouts – you sounded a bit libertarian there yourself (Freudian perhaps?) Teh Obamessiah has severely overstepped his boundaries with all these continued bailouts. I get he inherited the bailout from Bush. If he were really for “change” he would have stopped the bailouts to the auto industry and the financial sector.
As for unions – only 12-14% of employees in this country are in unions right now. We don’t need them. There are 100′s of EEOC laws on the books now that make unions obsolete. Sure, they served their purposes in the early 20th century. But, the American business structure has changed significantly. They are a real drag on companies and add unnecessary costs to consumer goods.
One last thing – all Americans should know the constitution – if they did – our country wouldn’t be in the mess it is in now.
@The BoBo : I disagree. (Surprised?) Unions will become obsolete when there is some sort of parity in the workplace. Executives earning 500 times what the average workers earn is nothing short of obscene. The problem is that only 12-14% of employees in this country are in unions right now. That figure needs to be much, much higher. Until it is, until we have the people who actually perform the work in this country standing up for what is rightfully theirs, we will continue to see the atrocities in the business and financial communities we are now seeing. The unions, the American workers, are not the drag on companies and they are not who is adding unnecessary costs to consumer goods. They simply are not. You are looking at this completely from the wrong angle. Once we weed out the failed CEOs and executives who are now receiving multimillion dollar salaries and bonuses each and every year while driving their companies into the ground to the point where our taxpayer dollars are needed to keep them operating, then you will see the prices of consumer goods and services return to reasonable levels. I do not understand this conservative proclivity to assign all the blame on the workers. That is not where our problems lie.
The Constitution has nothing to do with it. Whatsoever. We are no longer living in the 18th century. Times have changed.