<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New ad 10-11-08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/</link>
	<description>-- Proud. Liberal. American.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12593</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12593</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-12591&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt&lt;/a&gt; : Please read the comments policy that is published clearly for all to see directly beneath the comment entry form. It says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as &quot;spamming,&quot; &quot;trolling,&quot; or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You have your own blog on which you are free to attack or impugn the character of others. Please use it. Further personal attacks in the comment section of this blog will be removed. This has gone on long enough. It&#039;s over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-12591">Matt</a> : Please read the comments policy that is published clearly for all to see directly beneath the comment entry form. It says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as &#8220;spamming,&#8221; &#8220;trolling,&#8221; or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site.</p></blockquote>
<p>You have your own blog on which you are free to attack or impugn the character of others. Please use it. Further personal attacks in the comment section of this blog will be removed. This has gone on long enough. It&#8217;s over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12592</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12592</guid>
		<description>I had no intentions of directly insulting you but you seem determined to insult me. And as far as your critique of Lilly&#039;s blog, what does that have to do with the discussion at hand? I didn&#039;t know you were THAT Matt but I stand behind  your assessment of Lilly&#039;s blog. You hit the mark completely. But we&#039;re not talking about Lilly&#039;s blog, are we now? I never said you were incapable of a cognizant, well-thought out opinon, now did I?  Just because I agree with you in one area doesn&#039;t mean I agree with you on everything. Talk about ignorance. You are determined to attack so I think I will be the bigger participant and end it.  I agree with you. It&#039;s wrong to lump people into one big group. You can support the Rebublicans and still not agree with all they say. I get it. You are your own individual and wish to be defined as such and not categorized as just one of the crowd. You win. Do you feel better now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no intentions of directly insulting you but you seem determined to insult me. And as far as your critique of Lilly&#8217;s blog, what does that have to do with the discussion at hand? I didn&#8217;t know you were THAT Matt but I stand behind  your assessment of Lilly&#8217;s blog. You hit the mark completely. But we&#8217;re not talking about Lilly&#8217;s blog, are we now? I never said you were incapable of a cognizant, well-thought out opinon, now did I?  Just because I agree with you in one area doesn&#8217;t mean I agree with you on everything. Talk about ignorance. You are determined to attack so I think I will be the bigger participant and end it.  I agree with you. It&#8217;s wrong to lump people into one big group. You can support the Rebublicans and still not agree with all they say. I get it. You are your own individual and wish to be defined as such and not categorized as just one of the crowd. You win. Do you feel better now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12591</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12591</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wow Matt, do you really think that condescending statements make you superior or something?&quot;  Oh, no, that&#039;s Len.  

&quot;From my exalted position, it would be like being mad at an insect for being an insect.&quot;  See, those are his own words.  

But, since you claim to have read all the comments before you decided to insult me - &quot;And as far as Matt goes, he obviously can’t “debate” you on the issues so he has to attack your integrity — which is exactly what the McCain campaign was doing to Obama. If you don’t like being lumped into a group Matt, stop acting like your part of that group.&quot; - then surely you know that I was the one who took the high road and called the remark he quoted from the right-wing blog what it really was - ridiculous - and told him I didn&#039;t agree with it.  If &lt;strong&gt;you&lt;/strong&gt; don&#039;t like being lumped into one group like you said then I would think you would understand my point, but you chose to attack me instead.  Speaks to your own character - I believe the word is &lt;strong&gt;hypocrite&lt;/strong&gt;. I guess it serves me right for trying to find common ground with those who truly think they are above the rest of us.

By the way, if I am so ignorant why did you give me such a nice compliment on your blog in your most recent post  &lt;a href=&quot;http://meandtheblueskies.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;You&#039;re appreciated!  If you blog it he will come&quot;?&lt;/a&gt;  A review of her blog by Matt on Entrecard describes her blog much better than I could: “Lilly has an uncanny ability to make everyday events in her life into very funny and entertaining stories for her readers. Yet, she shows great insight and perspective on important issues that affect us all. She has several ‘series’ which she posts to on a regular basis and I highly recommend them all.”

Seems to me if my character was so bad you wouldn&#039;t be praising me, would you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wow Matt, do you really think that condescending statements make you superior or something?&#8221;  Oh, no, that&#8217;s Len.  </p>
<p>&#8220;From my exalted position, it would be like being mad at an insect for being an insect.&#8221;  See, those are his own words.  </p>
<p>But, since you claim to have read all the comments before you decided to insult me &#8211; &#8220;And as far as Matt goes, he obviously can’t “debate” you on the issues so he has to attack your integrity — which is exactly what the McCain campaign was doing to Obama. If you don’t like being lumped into a group Matt, stop acting like your part of that group.&#8221; &#8211; then surely you know that I was the one who took the high road and called the remark he quoted from the right-wing blog what it really was &#8211; ridiculous &#8211; and told him I didn&#8217;t agree with it.  If <strong>you</strong> don&#8217;t like being lumped into one group like you said then I would think you would understand my point, but you chose to attack me instead.  Speaks to your own character &#8211; I believe the word is <strong>hypocrite</strong>. I guess it serves me right for trying to find common ground with those who truly think they are above the rest of us.</p>
<p>By the way, if I am so ignorant why did you give me such a nice compliment on your blog in your most recent post  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://meandtheblueskies.blogspot.com/" >&#8220;You&#8217;re appreciated!  If you blog it he will come&#8221;?</a>  A review of her blog by Matt on Entrecard describes her blog much better than I could: “Lilly has an uncanny ability to make everyday events in her life into very funny and entertaining stories for her readers. Yet, she shows great insight and perspective on important issues that affect us all. She has several ‘series’ which she posts to on a regular basis and I highly recommend them all.”</p>
<p>Seems to me if my character was so bad you wouldn&#8217;t be praising me, would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12590</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12590</guid>
		<description>Wow Matt, do you really think that condescending statements make you superior or something?  I read ALL of the comments which is why I made the comment about being &quot;lumped into one group.&quot;  But where do you get off complaining that I &quot;inject&quot; myself into a conversation that doesn&#039;t concern me. You truly show your ignorance with that statement.  This is a public blog. It&#039;s open to EVERYONE.  These aren&#039;t private emails for your and Len&#039;s eyes only. And I get that you don&#039;t like to be &quot;lumped&quot; into a single group and I agree with you.  I don&#039;t like it when people do that to me.  But I won&#039;t resort to &lt;strike&gt;Republican tactics &lt;/strike&gt;name calling like you do. I think your comments speak volumes about your character. You don&#039;t need any help from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Matt, do you really think that condescending statements make you superior or something?  I read ALL of the comments which is why I made the comment about being &#8220;lumped into one group.&#8221;  But where do you get off complaining that I &#8220;inject&#8221; myself into a conversation that doesn&#8217;t concern me. You truly show your ignorance with that statement.  This is a public blog. It&#8217;s open to EVERYONE.  These aren&#8217;t private emails for your and Len&#8217;s eyes only. And I get that you don&#8217;t like to be &#8220;lumped&#8221; into a single group and I agree with you.  I don&#8217;t like it when people do that to me.  But I won&#8217;t resort to <strike>Republican tactics </strike>name calling like you do. I think your comments speak volumes about your character. You don&#8217;t need any help from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12589</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12589</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I do not associate with hateful people in real life and I see no reason to do so on my blog.

Really????

&lt;/blockquote&gt; (BTW, I happen to agree with most of what the good folks at moveon.org and The Huffington Post have to say.)

Your lack of moral fiber is outdone only by your complete denial of the facts!  Have YOU watched the news or read a paper lately?  You don&#039;t need me to direct you to any sites that spew the filth I was talking about because you already said you agree with a couple of them.  And, I notice the Daily Kos is listed on your side bar under &quot;Americans&quot; (the Kos should offend every American, not just conservatives) yet you have a separate category for conservatives.  Aren&#039;t conservatives American in your world?

Perhaps the saddest part of this whole dialogue is that I tried to engage you in intelligent debate when you decided (as usual) to lump all conservatives together in a a condescending way and then you have the gall to say I am the one spreading hate?  I guess you&#039;re not interested in the opinions of anyone who doesn&#039;t completely agree with you. Next time you disparage someone the way you have disparaged me I suggest you take a long, hard look in the mirror, friend.

@Preston - If you want to try and inject yourself into a discussion that doesn&#039;t concern you at least read ALL the previous posts first, lest you show your true ignorance.  The whole discussion was over the fact that I didn&#039;t agree with the following statement,  &quot;I believe the markets are crashing because people are angry and afraid of the socialism that will take over our country if Obama is elected.&quot;, and Len claimed that all right-wingers think the same way so we must all agree with that statement.  And, somehow, after I refuted the statement, I am accused of spreading hate.  Wow, you two really are living in a dream world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I do not associate with hateful people in real life and I see no reason to do so on my blog.</p>
<p>Really????</p>
</blockquote>
<p> (BTW, I happen to agree with most of what the good folks at moveon.org and The Huffington Post have to say.)</p>
<p>Your lack of moral fiber is outdone only by your complete denial of the facts!  Have YOU watched the news or read a paper lately?  You don&#8217;t need me to direct you to any sites that spew the filth I was talking about because you already said you agree with a couple of them.  And, I notice the Daily Kos is listed on your side bar under &#8220;Americans&#8221; (the Kos should offend every American, not just conservatives) yet you have a separate category for conservatives.  Aren&#8217;t conservatives American in your world?</p>
<p>Perhaps the saddest part of this whole dialogue is that I tried to engage you in intelligent debate when you decided (as usual) to lump all conservatives together in a a condescending way and then you have the gall to say I am the one spreading hate?  I guess you&#8217;re not interested in the opinions of anyone who doesn&#8217;t completely agree with you. Next time you disparage someone the way you have disparaged me I suggest you take a long, hard look in the mirror, friend.</p>
<p>@Preston &#8211; If you want to try and inject yourself into a discussion that doesn&#8217;t concern you at least read ALL the previous posts first, lest you show your true ignorance.  The whole discussion was over the fact that I didn&#8217;t agree with the following statement,  &#8220;I believe the markets are crashing because people are angry and afraid of the socialism that will take over our country if Obama is elected.&#8221;, and Len claimed that all right-wingers think the same way so we must all agree with that statement.  And, somehow, after I refuted the statement, I am accused of spreading hate.  Wow, you two really are living in a dream world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12588</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12588</guid>
		<description>I am a firm believer in open discussions but, Yikes!  It&#039;s a good thing Matt hasn&#039;t discovered Politi-Gal over at potligal1.blogspot.com.  Her spoof of McCain as the Penguin is absolutely hysterical!  But parodies do not necessarily equal hate.  And as far as Matt goes, he obviously can&#039;t &quot;debate&quot; you on the issues so he has to attack your integrity -- which is exactly what the McCain campaign was doing to Obama.  If you don&#039;t like being lumped into a group Matt, stop acting like your part of that group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a firm believer in open discussions but, Yikes!  It&#8217;s a good thing Matt hasn&#8217;t discovered Politi-Gal over at potligal1.blogspot.com.  Her spoof of McCain as the Penguin is absolutely hysterical!  But parodies do not necessarily equal hate.  And as far as Matt goes, he obviously can&#8217;t &#8220;debate&#8221; you on the issues so he has to attack your integrity &#8212; which is exactly what the McCain campaign was doing to Obama.  If you don&#8217;t like being lumped into a group Matt, stop acting like your part of that group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12587</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12587</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-12585&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matt&lt;/a&gt; : Who has been making fun of a three month old child with Down Syndrome? Could you provide me with some links please? I&#039;d be interested in seeing who is doing that.

If I were you, I don&#039;t think I&#039;d be talking about moral fiber or people wanting to kill their political enemies because they disagree with them. Been watching the news or reading any newspapers lately? I know... it&#039;s all lies because it&#039;s the liberal media. Whatever.

Please, as long as you are supporting the Republican party, do not dare come here and lecture me about hate. I mean it. That particular boat just isn&#039;t going to float around here, my friend.

Now, unless you have something nice to say or can in some way back up the hate you have been spewing, I&#039;m done with you. I am. I do not associate with hateful people in real life and I see no reason to do so on my blog.

Keep digging, Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-12585">Matt</a> : Who has been making fun of a three month old child with Down Syndrome? Could you provide me with some links please? I&#8217;d be interested in seeing who is doing that.</p>
<p>If I were you, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be talking about moral fiber or people wanting to kill their political enemies because they disagree with them. Been watching the news or reading any newspapers lately? I know&#8230; it&#8217;s all lies because it&#8217;s the liberal media. Whatever.</p>
<p>Please, as long as you are supporting the Republican party, do not dare come here and lecture me about hate. I mean it. That particular boat just isn&#8217;t going to float around here, my friend.</p>
<p>Now, unless you have something nice to say or can in some way back up the hate you have been spewing, I&#8217;m done with you. I am. I do not associate with hateful people in real life and I see no reason to do so on my blog.</p>
<p>Keep digging, Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12586</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12586</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-12584&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jenn&lt;/a&gt; : Not quite as far as some of the hate mongers on the right, Jenn. I&#039;m not willing to kill or bomb the candidates of the opposing party. I do love my country, though, and will work to protect her from the right wing of the Republican party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-12584">Jenn</a> : Not quite as far as some of the hate mongers on the right, Jenn. I&#8217;m not willing to kill or bomb the candidates of the opposing party. I do love my country, though, and will work to protect her from the right wing of the Republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12585</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12585</guid>
		<description>Your support of far-left hate sites tells me everything I need to know.  I guess it&#039;s not fair for me to try to debate someone who lacks the moral fiber to distance himself from people who want to kill their political enemies because they disagree with them, and who would actually make fun of a three month old child with Down Syndrome.  Watch out for that old bitch, karma; she bites hard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your support of far-left hate sites tells me everything I need to know.  I guess it&#8217;s not fair for me to try to debate someone who lacks the moral fiber to distance himself from people who want to kill their political enemies because they disagree with them, and who would actually make fun of a three month old child with Down Syndrome.  Watch out for that old bitch, karma; she bites hard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/2008/10/11/new-ad-10-11-08/comment-page-1/#comment-12584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esoterically.net/weblog/?p=8896#comment-12584</guid>
		<description>&quot;You may be surprised &lt;strong&gt;how far I may be willing to go&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; to save my country from you people on the right wrong side.&quot;

Really Len? How far is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You may be surprised <strong>how far I may be willing to go</strong><em> to save my country from you people on the right wrong side.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really Len? How far is that?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
