Thanks for dropping by, though. It’s always good to see what little we are up against. (sorry)

With all due respect to your hero worship here

Still waiting for the respect.

First and foremost, Obama was not indeed correct about what he said (if he was, then why is he backing away and saying he didn’t mean what he said). If you believe he was correct, then you are just as misguided as he his.

Secondly, Obama lumped religion in with guns and problems with people who are different (a backhanded attempt to say racism). The reality is that you cannot politically demean religion by lumping into less important issues (like guns) or negative qualities (such as racism).

Lastly, Obama will have much bigger problems with this in the general election where a large portion of the electorate are very religious and base their election choices largely on that religion. Certainly there is much more “agreement” that there is something wrong with people who vote religion, vote guns, or vote social issues within the liberal communty that will determine the nomination. But once you get past that process… those who look down on people who see social issues as the more important issues of elections become a minority.

At the end of the day the candidate who most closely resembles the values of the majority of the electorate will become President. It won’t be the one who makes the most promises or gives the best speeches. Obama took a huge step backwards with this statement. Couple it with the anti-American stances of his own spiritual advisor and his own wife, and it looks like you have a problem, Houston.