Jan 29 2004

Diane Sawyer reports

Posted by Len on Thursday at 4:17 pm in Election 2004

The Dean Scream: The version of reality that we didn’t see on TV

New York — It was the scream Howard Dean says became famous after the media played it nearly 700 times in a few days. Not only that, his camp adds, what we heard on the air was not a reflection of the way it sounded in the room

After my interview with Dean and his wife in which I played the tape again — in fact played it to them — I noticed that on that tape he’s holding a hand-held microphone. One designed to filter out the background noise. It isolates your voice, just like it does to Charlie Gibson and me when we have big crowds in the morning. The crowds are deafening to us standing there

But the viewer at home hears only our voice.

So, we collected some other tapes from Dean’s speech including one from a documentary filmmaker, tapes that do carry the sound of the crowd, not just the microphone he held on stage. We also asked the reporters who were there to help us replicate what they experienced in the room.

Reena Singh, ABC News Dean campaign reporter: “What the cameras didn’t capture was the crowd.”

Garance Franke-Ruta, Senior Editor, American Prospect: “As he spoke, the audience got louder and louder and I found it somewhat difficult to hear him.”

Dean’s boisterous countdown of the upcoming primaries as we all heard it on TV was isolated, when in fact he was shouting over the roaring crowd.

And what about the scream as we all heard it? In the room, the so-called scream couldn’t really be heard at all. Again, he was yelling along with the crowd.

Neal Gabler, Senior Fellow, Lear Center USA: “When you’re talking about visuals, context is everything. So, you’ve got a situation in which you have what I’d call the televised version of reality, which is not the same as the actual reality in room. You know in a situation like this, no one takes responsibility.”

How do the networks see it? Here are comments from network executives to ABC News:

CBS News: “Individually we may feel okay about our network, but the cumulative effect for viewers with 24-hour cable coverage is — it may have been overplayed and, in fact, a disservice to Dean and the viewers.” — Andrew Heyward, President - CBS News

ABC News: “It’s always a danger that we’ll use good video too much.” — David Westin, President - ABC News

CNN: “We’ve all been wrestling with this. If we had it to do over again, we’d probably pull ourselves back.” — Princell Hair, General Manager - CNN

Fox News: “It got overplayed a bit, and the public clearly thought that, too, and kept him alive for another round.” — Roger Ailes, Chairman and CEO - Fox News

Too little, too late. Can we go back and hold the New Hampshire primary again? No, we cannot. You would almost think that the television networks would have the smarts not to pull a stunt like this. Obviously, they do not.

All we can do now is move forward and be sure that Howard Dean is our next president. There is not doubt that he is the best qualified of all the candidates running, including George W. Bush. Do your part and contribute right now. America will thank you!

One Response to “Diane Sawyer reports”

  1. Marcia Couchon 17 Feb 2004 at 11:56 Reply to this comment

    Dear Diane,
    Thank you for the many hours you have spent in the last few years in covering our world. I know your life is high paced trying to keep up with the constant news breaks. Sometimes, we can miss eternal Truth from our Creator because of all the distractions.
    Could you please search the Holy Scriptures and tell me why Jesus Christ spoke more about a place called Hell than a place called Heaven?
    Thank you.
    Marcia